Buta Biberaj: “The judges are NOT pro-US they are all Republican”

During the Democratic Loudoun County Commonwealth’s Attorney Forum, hosted by Nick Minock and WJLA ABC-7 News, an alarming statement made by Ms. Biberaj came to light. As reported by Nick Minock during the event, a recording obtained by 7-News captured Ms. Biberaj stating, “The judges are NOT pro-US; they are all Republican.” While this statement may have gone unnoticed by some, its significance cannot be understated.

According to the “Professional Conduct” rules outlined by the VA State Bar, this particular statement made by Buta Biberaj appears to be in violation of section 8.2 regarding Judicial Officials. The rule explicitly states that “A lawyer must not make false statements or exhibit reckless disregard for the truth when discussing the qualifications or integrity of a judge or other judicial officer.”

While this violation may not be classified as the most egregious offense, it is nevertheless a clear breach of the VA State Bar’s “VA Rules of Professional Conduct.” It seems that Buta Biberaj continues to accumulate a concerning track record of transgressions. This latest incident adds yet another item to the long list of reasons why many view her as unfit for the position and consider her unelectable.

When a judicial official violates the rules of professional conduct, there can be several repercussions depending on the severity and nature of the violation. Here are some potential consequences:

1. Disciplinary Proceedings: The judicial official may face disciplinary proceedings initiated by the appropriate judicial disciplinary authority. This may involve an investigation into the alleged violation, gathering evidence, and conducting hearings to determine the extent of the violation and any necessary disciplinary actions.
2. Public Censure or Reprimand: If the violation is found to be substantiated, the judicial official may receive a public censure or reprimand. This serves as an official acknowledgment of the misconduct and can have a negative impact on the individual’s professional reputation.
3. Suspension: In more serious cases, the judicial official may face suspension from their position. This can range from a temporary suspension for a specific period to an indefinite suspension pending further investigation or disciplinary action.
4. Removal from Office: For grave or repeated violations, the ultimate consequence may be removed from the judicial position. This typically requires a formal process such as impeachment, judicial review, or a similar mechanism depending on the jurisdiction. Removal from office is a significant and rare step taken when the violations are considered severe and detrimental to the integrity and reputation of the judiciary.
5. Loss of Privileges: In addition to disciplinary measures, the judicial official may face the loss of certain privileges, such as the ability to handle certain cases or participate in specific judicial activities. This can be a form of restriction or limitation imposed as a consequence of the violation.

I’m not a lawyer so hopefully one can weigh in! It’s important to note that the specific consequences and procedures may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the governing body overseeing the conduct of judicial officials. Each jurisdiction has its own code of conduct and disciplinary mechanisms to ensure the integrity of the judiciary and maintain public confidence in the judicial system.